THE MYTH OF NEUTRALITY: EPISTEMOLOGICAL LIMITS AND IMPLICATIONS OF SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVITY IN CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY
Keywords:
Epistemology, Scientific neutrality, Critical psychology, SubjectivityAbstract
This work proposes a critical analysis of the discourse of neutrality in clinical psychology, seeking to understand how it contributes to the legitimation and reproduction of psychic suffering in a way that is detached from political and social reality. The problem lies in the critical suspension of the contexts that permeate the subject's experience, consequently framing them within an implicitly imposed model of subjectivity, which hinders their emancipation. Based on a narrative literature review, the study seeks to discuss how this perspective sustains a conception of scientific knowledge that disregards the historical, social, and political mediations that permeate the production of knowledge. Therefore, it argues for the need for a clinical practice that recognizes its historical, social, and political character, committed to the complexity of human experience.